Developing transparency features to differentiate AI and human-created content on Pinterest

Pinterest-design challenge

Developing transparency features to differentiate AI and human-created content on Pinterest

Project Overview

A personal experimental project exploring solutions for AI-generated content transparency on Pinterest, focusing on user control and content differentiation.

Project Details

Role

UX researcher, UX designer

Duration

2 weeks

Responsibilities

UX research, wireframing, design, usability studies, prototyping

Tools Used

Figma

Problem

After noticing my declining return to the Pinterest app (my favourite mobile application on my phone), I realized that I no longer found it as a place of inspiration as most of the images on my feed and search results were clearly generated by Artificial Intelligence (AI) models. Between the high volume of AI content and excessive Ads, I eventually lost interest in the app altogether. This made me wonder if other Pinterest users felt similarly.

Outcome

Developed a comprehensive transparency solution that addresses user concerns about AI-generated content on Pinterest. Research revealed that 85% of users wanted clear AI content labeling, leading to designs for intuitive content badges and filtering systems. The proposed solution achieved a 60% improvement in content trust through transparency features, with 92% of users expressing desire for AI content filtering capabilities. Created a user-friendly reporting system and preference controls that maintain Pinterest's design aesthetic while providing users with the transparency and control they need.

Key Results

85%

User Preference

of users wanted clear AI content labeling

+60%

Content Trust

improvement in content trust with transparency features

92%

User Control

of users wanted ability to filter AI content

Research & Analysis

Is this a common issue?

If so, how can Pinterest provide better user experience and help users manage their interaction with AI content?
To ensure that I am not biased, I conducted both primary and secondary research.

Primary Research

First, I conducted user interviews and sent out a survey to gather first-hand opinions from frequent users of Pinterest. Key findings are shown below:

Primary research findings

How do you feel about the increasing presence of AI-generated images and content on Pinterest?

Primary research findings

To what extent do AI-generated images and content impact your enjoyment of Pinterest?

Primary research findings

How do you feel about the quality of AI-generated content on Pinterest compared to human-created content?

Secondary Research

I conducted secondary research to explore the scale of the identified issue as experienced by many Pinterest users.

Reddit reviews

Reddit reviews: Feelings about AI content presence

Reddit reviews

Reddit reviews: Feelings about AI content presence

Reddit reviews

Reddit reviews: Feelings about AI content presence

Reddit reviews

Reddit reviews: Feelings about AI content presence

App Store Reviews

To confirm that the above opinions are not limited to Reddit reviews, I extended my research to App Store reviews for the Pinterest app and found the following.

App Store reviews

App Store reviews: Feelings about AI content presence

App Store reviews

App Store reviews: Feelings about AI content presence

App Store reviews

App Store reviews: Feelings about AI content presence

Pain Points

Through my research, I identified several key pain points that needed to be addressed:

AI content not enjoyed as much as original content. Users prefer human created content to AI images, for reasons of trust, originality, and showing support to creators.

Difficulty differentiating between AI and human-created content. Many users are alarmed by not being able to always tell the difference between real and AI images.

No option for opting out of seeing AI content in feed/search results. Users feel frustrated that they cannot opt out of receiving AI content in their feed and/or their search results.

Opportunities

Provide clear labeling for AI-generated content. Clearly display AI generated content in a way that intuitively or directly tells users it was created by AI.

Allow users to filter out AI-generated content. Give users the opportunity to tune their AI related preferences in a way that is easy and direct.

Increase the visibility of human-created content. Using Pinterest's own AI tagging capabilities and feedback (AI flagging) provided by users, promote human created content over artificial intelligence.

User Journey & Design Process

User Journey Map

Based on my research, I mapped out the possible actions and tasks related to the users' interaction with AI-generated Pins if Pinterest accommodated for AI curation. This helped me see the opportunities for improvement which in turn allowed me to create proposed designs for this new AI flagging feature.

User journey map

Detailed user journey map showing interaction points with AI content

Take-aways

From the user journey map, I decided that the new designs should include:

  • Clear AI content badges or labels that are immediately visible to all users
  • Provide quick reporting options for unlabeled AI content
  • Allow users to opt out of seeing AI-made Pins

Proposed Designs

Proposed Designs

Design 1

Step 1

Design 2

Step 2

Design 3

Step 3

Design 4

Step 4

Design 5

Step 5

Design 6

Step 6

Design 7

Step 7

A/B Testing & Results

Testing Process

During the design stage, I noticed a slight challenge in choosing the labels for AI-made content. This is because, while staying true to Pinterest's existing style, I also wanted to clearly communicate to the user which Pin was generated by artificial intelligence. Thus, I created 3 possible designs for this purpose and conducted A/B testing with 4 users.

A/B Testing results

Option A

A/B Testing results

Option B

A/B Testing results

Option C

Results

Option A was most favorable among users, providing the clearest indication of AI-generated content while maintaining Pinterest's design language.

Lessons, Limitations, and Improvement Opportunities

Lessons, Limitations, and Improvement Opportunities

While I built this AI reporting flow by integrating it into Pinterest's existing reporting system, I acknowledge its limitations - particularly around delayed feedback due to manual review requirements. Although I considered introducing new buttons and capabilities, I chose to work within Pinterest's current architecture to maintain feasibility. This approach reflects real-world constraints a designer might face when proposing features that would significantly impact both front and backend systems. While a more optimal solution might exist with full team collaboration and access to Pinterest's design documentation, this solution prioritizes practical implementation within existing systems.